Dr.Zakir Husain v. State Of Madhya Pradesh And ORS.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
^
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH
ATLBILASPUR M.C.C.No.....
4^ /2014 (Arising out ofWrit Petition(8) No. 642/2005 passed by Hon^ble Single Bench of C.G. High Court) APPLICANT ^'
Dr. Zakir Husain Son of Shri Hakim ^^:about ^ /^.V^v Commandant & Superintendent Kurban Husain, aged years, Deputy of Police (Wireless) Bilaspur (M.P.) now (C.G.) ^y
VERSUS
R^SPONDENTS 1.
^ The State of Madhya Pradesh Through its Secretary Home (Police) Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.) Managing Director, Madhya 2..
Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Habibganj, Bhopal(M.P.) 3.
Shri O.P.
Sami, Inspector General, Security and Vigilance, Madhya Pradesh Stage Road, Transport Corporation Habibganj, Bhopal (M.P.) Divisional Manager, Madhya 4.
Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Raipur (M.P.) The State of Chhattisgarh through Principal Secretary 5.
Home Department Secretariate Raipur (C.G.) r
€&f Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd., Through Managing Director Shashtri Chowk, Raipur 492001 (C.G.) Madhya Pradesh Road Transport Corporation through Managing Director Habibganj, Bhopal (M.P.) ^ APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P.fS.)No.64?/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
DIVISION BENCH HON'BLE MR.T.P. SHARMA. & HON'BLE MR. I.S. UBOWEJA. JJ M.C.C.No. 409 of 2014 Applicant Dr. Zakir Husain versus Resoondents The State of Madhya Pradesh and others.
APPLICATI©N€OlilRES'FORiit©N ©RW.P.fS)N0.642 of 2005 L'
'..
^lgelt-ance:
Mr. R.S. Baghel, counsel for the appliGant| Mrs. SKQbha Kashyap, Dy. Govt. Advocateforthe State/resporidents No.5 and 6.
O R D E R
<23.12.2014) T.P. SHARMA. J This is petition^ of W.P.(S)No.642/2005 dismissed for noriwc6mpliance of the order dated 13.12.2013. The petition has been filed after 109 days of its limitation. Heardon I.A.No.01/2014 for condonation of delay in filing the petition.
On due consideration, I.A.No.01/2014 allowed. Delay of 109 days in filing the petition is hereby condoned. 4.
Also heard on restoration petition.
5.
On due consideration, the petition allowed.
W.P.(S)No.
642/2005, which was dismissed for non-compliance of order
§ ^
1. ^.
dated 13.12.2013, is restored to its original number. The order dated 13.12.2013 shall be complied with within two Weeks from today. No order asto costs.
Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Sd/- Inder Singh Uboweja Judge Vijay