High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/941/2020disposed off

Dev Mahila Swa-Sahayta Samuh, Saja v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-03-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 941 of 2020 Dev Mahila Swa-Sahayta Samuh, Saja Through The President Laxmi Bai W/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 35 Years R/o Saja, Block Saja, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector District Bemetara Chhattisgarh

3. The Block Education Officer Saja, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh

4. Maa Annapurna Mahila Swa-Sahayata Samuh Ghotwani, Tharough Its Secretary/president, Tahsil Saja, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh

5. Maa Laxmi Mahila Swa-Sahayata Samuh Ward No. 02, Saja, Through Its Secretary/president, Tahsil Saja, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh

6. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Saja, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Sahid Ahmed Ansari, Adv.

For State : Ms. Sunita Jain, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 18/03/2020

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 02.03.2020 passed by the Respondent No. 3 whereby the respondent No. 5 has been alloted the work order for preparation and supply of mid-day-meal at the Govt. Girls Primary School, Saja, and Govt Boys Middle School, Saja.

2. Perusal of the records would show that, the petitioner has already preferred a representation/objection before the respondent No. 2 -District Collector in this regard on 09.03.2020 but till date the same has not been decided.

3. Given the said fact that there is a mechanism in the guideline itself for approaching the Collector against the order of the Block

Education Officer, this Court is of the opinion that the writ petition may be disposed of permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh appeal/representation to the respondent No. 2 and the respondent No. 2 in turn shall decide the same taking into consideration the contention that the petitioner shall make in the objection/representation at the earliest preferably within a period of 45 from today.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha