Bharat Lal Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1812 of 2020

1. Bharat Lal Sahu S/o Shri Babulal Sahu Aged About 41 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Bachheli, Block Gunderdehi, District Balod Chhattisgarh,

2. Ram Narayan Patel S/o Shri Nohar Sai Patel Aged About 47 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Bachheli, Block Gunderdehi, District Balod Chhattisgarh

3. Mirza Munavvar Beg S/o Shri Mirza Mumtaj Beg Aged About 48 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Devsara, Block Gunderdehi, District Balod Chhattisgarh

4. Daman Lal Patel S/o Shri Bisram Patel Aged About 36 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Kosagondi, Block Gurur, District Balod Chhattisgarh

5. Shashi Bhushan Sahu S/o Shri Bharat Bhushan Sahu Aged About 43 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Suregaon, Block Daundi Lohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh, ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. District Education Officer Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh,

3. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Gunderdehi, District Balod Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer Block Gunderdehi, District Balod Chhattisgarh,

5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Gurur, District Balod Chhattisgarh,

6. Block Education Officer Block Gurur, District Balod Chhattisgarh,

7. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Daundi Lohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh

8. Block Education Officer Block Daundi Lohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh, ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/ State :

Mr. Alok Bakshi, Addl. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 19.05.2020 1.

The limited grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed, but they have not been given the same till date.

2.

Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Vishakha