← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1965/2019disposed off

Dr. Rajni Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1965 of 2019

1. Dr. Rajni Patel D/o J.K. Patel, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near Jagannath Mandir, Baikunthpur, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

2. Dr. Anita Sahu W/o Vijay Kumar Sahu, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Devarbija, Tahsil Berla, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.

3. Dr. Poonam Singh Chouhan D/o Damru Ram Chouhan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Banki, Police Station Bankimongra, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

---Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director, Directorate Of Ayurved, Yog And Prakritik Chikitsa Paddhati, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Principal, Govt. Ayurved College Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents For petitioners :

Shri Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Anshuman Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 15/03/2019 1.

The counsel for the petitioners makes a limited prayer that the petitioners may be permitted to fill the form of MD (Ayurved) as the last date for filling up of the said form is today.

2.

According to the counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners have moved an application by which they have sought permission from the department to pursue the said MD course, but till date no permission has been granted and

the application for permission is pending consideration. According to him, if the petitioners are granted permission at a later stage, they would not be able to participate as they would not be in a position to fill up that form. 3.

Given the limited prayer that the petitioners have made, subject to the decision being taken on the application for permission sought for by the petitioners, the petitioners are as of now granted permission by this Court as a special case to apply for the said MD course subject to their filling up their form today itself.

4.

It is further directed that, the application for permission to appear in the MD course which is pending consideration before the authorities concerned be decided by the respondent No.2 within a period of 45 days from today. 5.

The counsel for the petitioners at this juncture submits that, in case if the authorities refuse to grant permission to the petitioners, then the petitioners would not raise any further claim on the same. 6.

With the aforesaid undertaking, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off.

7.

Certified copy today.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE