← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1786/2021dismissed

Rameshwar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-05-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(C) No. 1786 of 2021 • Rameshwar S/o Shri Late Dewan, Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Sakri, Police Station Chakarbhatha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of CoOperative, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

3. Branch Manager, Sava Sahakari Samiti Having Its Registration No. 45, Village Sakri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner:

Shri Lavkush Kumar Sahu, Advocate.

For State/Respondents:

Smt. Sunita Jain, Govt. Advocate.

Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, J Order On Board 26.05.2021 1.

Heard on admission.

2.

This petition has been filed by the Petitioner as Respondent No.3Branch Manager, Seva Sahkari Samiti, who has not released the amount of Rs.1,23,025/- for purchasing paddy for the year 2013-2014 despite the oder passed by Respondent No.2/Collector, Bilaspur on 12.02.2021 (annexure P1) and has prayed for following reliefs:- 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or appropriate writ, by which, direction to the respondent authorities to pay the rest amount of Rs.1,23,025/- with interest @ 18% from the date of purchasing of paddy expeditiously in accordance with law, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court be further pleased to grant such other relief as may be deemed fit and proper

in the interest of justice.

3.

At the outset, it appears that immediately after passing of the order dated 12.02.2021 (annexure P1), the Petitioner has approached the said authority while moving an application on 15.03.2021 (annexure P3) seeking issuance of direction against the said Samiti for the release of the said amount and, immediately thereafter, the instant petition has been filed while seeking the same relief.

4.

In view of above, I am not inclined to entertain this petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Vacation Judge Nikita