High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2709/2015withdrawn

L.N. Tyagi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-07-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2709 of 2015 • L.N. Tygai, aged about 61 years, S/o Late J.R. Tygai, OccupationService, Presently Posted and Working as In-Charge Executive Engineer , Water Resources Division, Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) • U.C. Singh, aged about 56 years, S/o Shri S.B. Singh, OccupationService, Presently Posted and Working as Sub Engineer, Water Resources Sub Division, Rajpur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) • The Engineer-In-Chief, Water Resources Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Sihawa Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) • The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Hasdeo Ganga Kachhar, Ambikapur, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) • Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department, Shyam Barnai Project Circle, Ambikapur, District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) • Umashankar Ram, Presently Working as Executive Engineer Water Resources Division Baikunthpur, District Koria And InCharge, Khutpali Diversion Scheme (Head Work), Balrampur, District Balrampur (Chhattisgarh) • Surendra Kumar Dubey, Sub Divisional OfÏcer, Guage Spillway Sub Division, Baikunthpur, District Koria And In-Charge, Khutpali Diversion Scheme (Head Work), Balrampur, District Balrampur (Chhattisgarh) • R.

P. Jain, Sub Engineer, Guage Spillway Sub Division, Baikunthpur, District Koria and In-Charge, Khutpali Diversion Scheme (Head Work), Balrampur, District Balrampur (Chhattisgarh) • J. K.

For Petitioners Mr. Sushil Dubey, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. P.K. Bhaduri, Government Advocate S.B.:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 30/7/2015 Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to prefer an appeal under Rule 23 of the C.G. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules. Permission granted.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioners. However, if appeal is preferred by the petitioners, it is expected of the appellate authority that the appeal is taken up for decision making at the earliest. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna