Ashok Sonwani v. State Of Chhattisgarh
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN T Single Bench ___._.HE HON'RmllIGH COURT'OF CHHATHSGARH '
AT mLAspUR Criminal Revision N0.
'
/2013 A RRIJ£3ANT Ashok Sonwani, S/o. Late Goverdhzm Sonwani, aged about 44 years;
R/o.
Mardapal, Forest Range Offiw Jagdalpur Purmanent Address .Vlllage Chhura Pol1ce Statlon and Post Chhura, X C1V11 and Revenue Dlst11ct Ralpur (1C G ) VERSU§ .R.E§,1ELQNDE1ET State 0f Chhattlsgarh through lncharge of Pollcc Stauon Kanku Dlstl lct North Bastar Kanker (C G ) r ::
~ Ne;-o',.,'
ciliMI aa.........
NAL RLVISION __LS_39L_,L/V S CTION 401 CODP Ol' LglMINAL PROCEDURF .
x"au m Imng aggrleved bVr Older dated 27 072013, passed by M hlnmual Sesamns Judgm, Uttar Bastar Kanker gassed 1n Cr1 10"?"
"Pal"
I ")5"- Appeal No 20/201 'llmVim app?cantwnamed M9 itk "MUN above Inost humbly be s lo plvivr the matant Iewsmn Inter aha on the grounds whlch Invoh 0d the followmg fm tq ~
HIQH CQURT OF QHgATTISG$§ AT EILASPUR SB:- Hog'ble §hri Qugtice T.P. Shanna Criminal Revisign No.554 of g013 App;icant vegsgs Respondent Stats of Chhattisgarh Criminal Eevision ugder Section 397 read with §ection 40 of the de of Criminal Prone ure.
Shri Manoj Paranjpe and Shri Vikram Dixit, Apgeargnce'.
counsel for the applicant.
Shri AS Padney, Govt.
Advocate for the State / reSpondent.
ORDER
(Passed on 19.12.2013) By this revision, the applicant has challenged the legality and correctness of order dated 27.7.2013 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Uttar Bastar Kanker in Criminal Appeal No.20/ 12, whereby the application filed by the ' applicant under Section 391 Cr.P.C. has been rejected. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the 2.
applicant seeks to withdraw the revision.
Consequently, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn. 3.
Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Bini