High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPPIL/39/2021withdrawn

Satyam Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh,

2021-06-09Hon'Ble The Acting Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

WPPIL No.39/2021 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Proceedings through video conferencing WPPIL No. 39 of 2021

1. Satyam Pandey S/o Shri A.K. Pandey, Aged About 51 Years Advocate By Profession, R/o Harshit Vihar, Phase - I Mahoba Bazar, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Pradeep Singh Rajput, S/o Shri N.S. Rajput, Aged About 45 Years R.T.I. Activist, Harshit Nagar, Mahoba Bazar, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Co-Operative Society, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Collector, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. Registrar, Co-Operative Society, Vivekananda Nagar, Pension Bada, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

5. Deputy Registrar, Co-Operative Society, First Floor, Vivekanand Complex, Vivekanand Nagar, Pension Bada, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

6. Kuber Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti (Maryadit), Raipur, Through - Its Board of Director, Kuber Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti (Maryadit), Old Name Karmachari Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti (Maryadit), Rohnipuram Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

7. Sevak Ram Pandey, Ex. - President, Karmachari Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti (Maryadit), Present Name of The Society Kuber Griha Nirman Sahkari Samiti (Maryadit), Rohanipuram, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioners - Shri Sourabh Sharma, Advocate.

For Respondents/State - Shri V.R. Tiwari, Additional Advocate General.

WPPIL No.39/2021 Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag.Chief Justice. Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, J.

Order On Board By Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag.Chief Justice. 09/06/2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to prefer a duly constituted Public Interest Litigation (PIL) afresh on the same cause of action.

2. Permission granted.

3. Accordingly, the present WPPIL is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

SD/- SD/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Acting Chief Justice Judge Amardeep