← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2737/2015disposed off

M. K. Chakraborty v. South Eastern Coalfields Limited

2015-07-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 2737 of 2015 M. K. Chakraborty S/o Late Shri Hem Chand Chakraborty, Aged about 61 years, Retired Accountant A- 1, EC No. 24750726, Earlier Posted At South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Bilaspur, R/o Rajiv Vihar, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Chairman- CumManaging Director, SECL Headquarters, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Director (Personnel), South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Secl Headquarters, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents : Shri Abhishek Sinha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 31/07/2015 Grievance of the petitioner in the instant petition is that he has been denied the benefit of correction of pay fixation w.e.f. 01.07.2005 on wards.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent authorities themselves had sent the matter of the petitioner to a committee for considering his grievance but the committee till date have not submitted any report on the basis of which a decision would be taken by the respondents. Counsel for the petitioner also refers to a reply to the legal notice sent on behalf of the respondents wherein paragraph-3 holds as under:

"This is to inform you that the committee has been given a reminder letter on 14.05.2015 to submit its report and till date the report of the committee has not been received. On submission of such report further necessary action will be taken."

3.

Considering the reply dated 11.07.2015 given by the respondents to the legal notice, this Court is of the opinion that the ends of justice would meet if the respondents are directed to take an appropriate action in the case of the petitioner expeditiously.

4.

Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the respondents shall ensure that the decision in the case of the petitioner would be taken and communicated to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Bhola