Prema Janki Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 800 of 2018 Prema Janki Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Development Block Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh Through Its President, Smt. Imarti Devi Agrawal, Wife Of Shri Murarilal Agrawal, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Village Bangla Bhata, Bilaigarh, Development Block Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Commissioner, Department Of Women And Child Development, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Mandir Hasod, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. District Collector, Collectorate, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
4. District Programme Officer, Women And Child Development Department, Collectorate Compound, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
5. Child Development Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project, Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Abhyuday Singh under instructions of Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate.
For Respondents/State :
Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Adv. General.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 23/03/18 1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by virtue of clause 11.3 of the amended instructions dated 05.06.2017, the
petitioner is entitled to continue for the period of five years and then only the circular dated 05.06.2017 would apply but on the other hand, by order dated 01.02.2018, District Programme Officer has called for fresh application for supply of ready to eat food for Nagarda Sector under Bilaigarh Project. 2.
Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation before the District Programme Officer within a period of seven days from today bringing to his notice Clause 11.3 of the amended instructions dated 05.06.2017, which will be considered and decided within a further period of seven days from the date of receipt of such representation in accordance with law.
3.
With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka