High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1036/2016disposed off

Smt. Nisha Bhanu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-08-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1036 of 2016 Smt. Nisha Bhanu W/o Shri Virendra Bhanu, Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Amora Via Gopalnagar, P.S. Mulmula, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahandi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

3. Block Education Officer, Block Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

5. Jwala Prasad Banjare, Teacher Panchayat Govt. Middle School, Bhilai B., Block Baloda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

6. Sharad Kumar Binjhwar, Teacher Panchayat Govt. Middle School, Nawapara Khisora, Block Baloda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

7. Tekram Kurre, Teacher Panchayat Govt. Middle School, Podidalha, Block Akaltara District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

8. Khagendra Kumar Bhaina, Teacher Panchayat Govt. Middle School, Chhotemudpar, Block Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

9. Manoj Kumar Bhanu, Teacher Panchayat Govt. Middle School, Kandara, Block Baloda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

10. Madan Lal Rathiya, Teacher Panchayat Govt. Middle School, Kharri, Block Malkharoda, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh

11. Smt. Nirmalal Paikra, Teacher Panchayat Govt. Middle School, Tarod Block Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents Shri N.Naha Roy, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Manish Nigam and Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for respective respondents.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 24/08/2017 Learned counsel for the respondents submit that the order passed by the Division Bench by this Court in W.A. No.475/2015 and batch of petitioners on 29/10/2015 only relates to eligibility and not seniority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner's only claim is for eligibility and not seniority.

Therefore, it is directed that the petitioner's claim for eligibility may be considered and decided in view of the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.475/2015 and batch of petitions, as early as possible. This petition is accordingly disposed off.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti