Prahlad Prasad Rathore v. State Of Chhattisgarh
-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2584 of 2018 Prahlad Prasad Rathore S/o Late Onkar Prasad Rathore Aged About 37 Years R/o Police Station Khokra, Tahsil Janjgir, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Janpad Panchayat Malkharauda, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh, Through Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Malkharauda DistrictJanjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
4. Jila Panchayat District- Janjgir- Champa, Through Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Vimlesh Bajpai, Advocate For State :
Shri Majid Ali, Dy. Govt. Advocate S.B. : Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 26/03/2018 Heard.
1. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated
-223.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised payscale on completion of 8 years of service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.
2. In view of the aforesaid submission and that the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, this petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years of service by including the services rendered by him on a lower post or on the same post.
3. No order as to costs.
Sd/-/---- -- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen