Shankar Purame v. Raju Vishwakarma

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT, BILASPUR E- LOK ADALAT (Arising out of award dated 27.10.2016 passed by 8 th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur, C.G. in claim case No. 270/2015) Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya Member - Lok Adalat : Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate Misc. Appeal (C) No. 632 of 2017

1. Shankar Purame, aged about 45 years, son of Charan Purame,

2. Pappu Purame, aged about 22 years, son of Shankar Purame,

3. Ku. Geetanjali Purame, aged about 15 years, D/o. Shankar Purame,

4. Satish Purame, aged about 12 years, Son of Shankar Purame,

5. Karan Purame, aged about 11 years, son of Shankar Purame,

6. Ku. Trichna Purame, aged about 10 years, Son of Shankar Purame No. 3 to 6 are minor, through their natural guardian father Shankar Purame (Appellant No. 1), All are R/o. Village Chandandih, P.S. Amanaka, District Bilaspur (C.G.), ---- Appellants

Versus

1. Raju Vishwakarma, aged about 34 years, son of Nandu Vishwakarma, R/o. Village Sarteth, P.S. Gunderdehi, District Balod (C.G.), (Driver of truck NO. CG-18, K-2154,

2. Smt. Renu Maliya, wife of Manoj Singh Maliya, R/o. Ward No. 1 Dantewada, P.S. Dantewada, District Dantewada (C.G.), (Owner of Truck No. CG-18, K2154)

3. Bharti General Insurance Company Limited, Through : Divisional Manager, Chawla Complex, Devendra Nagar Road, Raipur, Town and District- Raipur (C.G.), (Insurer of Truck No. CG- 18, K-2154). ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellants - Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate.

For Respondent No. 03/Insurance Company - Shri N. K. Thakur, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Award (Passed on 11th July, 2020)

1. 1.

The contesting parties to this appeal have amicably settled/compromised the dispute, which is subject matter of this appeal, voluntarily. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal. There is no legal impediment to compromise and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement, proposed by the parties and order that the Respondent No.3/Insurance Company shall pay Rs. 3,35,000/- (three lacks thirty five thousand) by way of compensation in addition to the amount awarded by the Tribunal to the appellants within 60 days from today, failing which the respondent No. 3/Insurance Company shall be liable to pay interest @ 6% per annum from today till its payment.

2.

2.

Copy of this award should be provided free of cost to the parties immediately.

Sd/- Sd/- (Gautam Chourdiya) ( Rajeev Shrivastava) Judge -Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur amita