Prathmik Krishi Sakh Sahkari Samiti Badedabha v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 960 OF 2020 Prathmik Krishi Sakh Sahkari Samiti Badedabha, Registration No. 1349, Dhan Uparjan Kendra Badedabha, through its Centre Incharge, Rameshwar Kaiwart S/o Jogi Ram, aged about 46 years, R/o Village Kewtapali, Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund (CG) ... Petitioner versus 1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 2.

Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, Cooperative Society Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 3.

Collector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG) 4.

District Mark-Fed Officer, Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipnan Sangh, Mahasamund District Mahasamund (CG) 5.

Deputy Registrar, Societies, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG) 6.

District Cooperative Central Bank Maryadit, through its CEO, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) 7.

Nodal Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (CG) ... Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Mr. Amrito Das, Addl. Advocate General.

For Respondent-Federation :

Mr. Ashish Surana, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 23/ 03/2020 1.

The dispute in the present Writ Petition substantially is that of non-lifting of the paddy by Respondent No.4.

2.

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Counsel for Respondent No.4 submits that the Petitioner-Society has already got themselves registered for transportation of the paddy by themselves to Respondent No.4-Federation. Learned Counsel for Respondent No.4 further submits that since the Petitioner-Society have got themselves registered in that event as per clause 2.6 of the agreement they themselves can get the paddy lifted and transported at the nearest storage centre of Respondent No.4-Federation.

3.

With the above submission by Respondent No.4-Federation, the present Writ Petition itself can be disposed of with a direction to the Petitioner-Society to take appropriate steps for transportation of the paddy by themselves and delivered the same at the nearest storage centre of Respondent No.4-Federation. In case of any doubt or confusion so far as the storage centre at which the paddy has to be delivered, the

Petitioner-Society can approach the Respondent No.4-Federation who shall issue appropriate guidelines or instructions to the Petitioner informing them about the destination at which the paddy has to be delivered. In the event, if there is any further dispute regarding the quantity or quality of the paddy etc., all those issues would be resolved in terms of the agreement entered into between the parties and the standards and specifications provided for the same.

4.

The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge /sharad/