← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2099/2021disposed off

R.K.M. Powergen Pvt. Ltd., v. Chief Secretary,

2021-07-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2099 of 2021 R.K.M. Powergen Pvt. Ltd., Represented By Its Authorised Representative Shri J. Mohan Village - Ucchpinda Post - Dhurkot, Police Station - Dabhra District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

Chief Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 2.

Secretary, Department Of Water Resource, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C G) Mantralaya Raipur, District: Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.

Chief Engineer, Minimata (Hasdev) Bango Project, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4.

Executive Engineer, W R D Survey And Barrage Construction, Division - I, Kharsia, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Kishore Bhaduri, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate For State :

Mr. Amrito Das, Additional A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 22/07/2021 1.

The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the grievance as of now would be redressed if this Court would direct the respondents No.2 & 3 to take an appropriate decision in accordance with the Rules governing the field on the representation which the petitioner has preferred to the respondents in respect of the entering of the agreement between the petitioner and the respondents on the drawal of the water from Mahanadi River.

2.

The representation of the petitioner seems to be in respect of Unit-2 installed by the petitioner-establishment. The petitioner already have an agreement with the State Authorities in respect of Unit-1. 3.

Given the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the respondents No.2 & 3 to take an appropriate decision on the representation so filed by the petitioner at the earliest within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 4.

With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved