High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1275/2016withdrawn

Kundanlal Suryavanshi v. Union Of India

2017-03-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1275 of 2016

1. Kundanlal Suryavanshi S/o Babulal Suryavanshi, Aged About 52 Years R/o Near Electricity Office, Pratappur, Tahsil, Police Station And Post Pratappur, Civil And Revenue District Surajpur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union Of India Through : Secretary, Ministry Of Personnel, Public Grievances And Pension, Department Of Personnel And Training, New Delhi, India.

2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through: Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Police Station Raipur, Head Post Office Raipur, Police And Revenue District Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Engineer In Chief, Water Resources Department, Sinhawa Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Police Station Raipur, Head Post Office Raipur, Police And Revenue District Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Engineer In Chief, Water Resources Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Police Station And Post Bhopal, Police And Revenue District Bhopal, District Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh

5. Chief Engineer, Hasdeo Ganga Kachhar, Water Resources Department, Chhattisgarh, Ambikapur, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Division, Shyam Barnai Mandal, Ambikapur, District Surguja, (Chhattisgarh)

7. Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Surajpur, District Surajpur, (Chhattisgarh)

8. State Of Madhya Pradesh, Through: Secretary, Water Resources Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, Police Station And Post Bhopal, Police And Revenue District Bhopal, District Bhopal, (Madhya Pradesh) ---- Respondent

For Petitioner Shri Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent/UOI Shri R.K. Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Rajendra Tripathi, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 27/03/2017

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

2. No objection from other side.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra