High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1979/2019disposed off

Pooja Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1979 of 2019

1. Pooja Singh W/o Sudhir Kumar Singh, Aged About 33 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat ) At Govt. Higher Secondary School Beloudi, Block Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

2. Smt. Sushma Sagar W/o Rakesh Sagar, Aged About 31 Years Working As Lecturer ( Panchayat) At Govt. Higher Secondary School Beloudi, Block Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh

3. Siteshwar Sahu S/o Late Mansha Ram Sahu, Aged About 30 Years Working As Teacher ( Panchayat) P.T.I. At Govt. Higher Secondary School Medesara, Block Dhamdha, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Ekta Tamrakar D/o Salik Ram Tamrakar, Aged About 30 Years Working As Teacher ( Panchayat) P.T.I. At Govt. Higher Secondary School Nankatti, Block Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh

5. Santoshi Sahu D/o Jeevrakhan Sahu, Aged About 31 Years Working As Teacher ( Panchayat) P.T.I. At Govt. Higher Secondary School Beloudi, Block Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

6. Sapna Yadav D/o Ramulal Yadav, Aged About 32 Years Working As Teacher ( Panchayat ) P.T.I. At Govt. Higher Secondary School Aheri, Block Dhamdha, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh

7. Himanshu Kumar S/o Umashankar, Aged About 31 Years Working As Teacher ( Panchayat) P.T.I. At Govt. Higher Secondary School Panhdor, Block Patan, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya,

Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Shriya Mishra, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 19.03.2019he grievance of the petitioner is non counting of her past service

1. The grievance of the petitioners is non counting of their past service rendered prior to joining of present employment.

2. The contention of the petitioners is that the matter stands covered by the decision of this court rendered in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) as also the batch of writ petitions disposed of by this Court on 27.10.2018, the lead case of which being WPS No.6147 of 2018 (Shabnum Khatun Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.) and other analogous petitions.

3. The counsel appearing for the State submits that probably the petitioners as of now do not have minimum required length of service for grant of benefit that they have claimed for which otherwise has not been disputed by the counsel for the petitioner.

4. Given the facts, the writ petition stands disposed of with an

observation that the petitioners on their completing the required length of service of 8 years shall approach the authorities in the department for the relief sought for and the authorities shall consider the same in the light of the decision rendered by this Court in the case of similarly placed persons and shall pass an appropriate order.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai