Smt. Sukmati Netam v. Shri Neeraj Bansod
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 358 of 2015 • Smt. Sukmati Netam W/o Shri D.R.Netam Aged About 40 Years Patwari, P.H.No.09, Pakela, Post & Thana- Sukma, Distt.- Sukma, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
• Shri Neeraj Bansod Collector- Sukma, District- Sukma, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent And CONT No. 362 Of 2015 • Deepak Bhardwaj S/o Shri Ganesh Ram Aged About 39 Years Patwari, P.H.No.22, Injram, Post- Injaram & Thana- Konta, Distt.- Sukma, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs • Shri Neeraj Bansod Collector- Sukma, District- Sukma, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent And CONT No. 363 Of 2015 • Ajay Khandekar S/o Shri R.R. Khandekar Aged About 38 Years Patwari, P.H.No. 06, Mankapal, Post & Thana-Gadiras, Distt.- Sukma Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs • Shri Neeraj Bansod Collector- Sukma, District - Sukma Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent And CONT No. 361 Of 2015 • Shripal Beck S/o Shri Dasai Ram Beck Aged About 26 Years Patwari, P.H.
No. 06, Chintalnar, Post & Thana-Konta , Distt. Sukma Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs • Shri Neeraj Bansod Collector- Sukma, District - Sukma Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent And CONT No. 360 Of 2015 • Tankeshwar Dewangan S/o Late Shri B.R. Dewangan Aged About 46 Years Patwari, P.H. No. 04, Gadiras, Post & Thana- Gadiras, Distt. Sukma Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs • Shri Neeraj Bansod Collector- Sukma, District - Sukma Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent And CONT No. 359 Of 2015 • Sunil Samrath S/o Shri Balram Singh Samrath Aged About 38 Years Patwari, P.H.No.25, Konta, Post & Thana- Konta, Distt.- Sukma, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs • Shri Neeraj Bansod Collector- Sukma, District- Sukma, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioners :
Shri SK Verma, Advocate For Respondents-State :
Shri Prafull N. Bharat, Additional Advocate General for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 10/09/2015
1. Learned Additional Advocate General would appear along with Shri Neeraj Bansod Collector- Sukma, District- Sukma, Chhattisgarh and would submit that the contempt has been purged.
2. In view of the submission made, nothing survives for proceeding further in the matter.
3. The contempt proceeding is dropped.
Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu