High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1954/2019disposed off

Smt. F. N. Dwivedi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1954 of 2019 Smt. F. N. Dwivedi W/o Dr. Laxmikant Dwivedi Aged About 61 Years Occupation Assistant Food Officer, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Food, Public Distribution And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya Police Station Rakhi Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Special Secretary Department Of Food, Public Distribution And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya Police Station Rakhi Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The District Collector Durg Collectorate Building District Durg Chhattisgarh.

4. The Controller Food Durg Collectorate Building Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vipin Tiwari, Advocate For State :

Mr. Sameer Behar, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 19/03/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 20.02.2019 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from district Durg to district Kondagaon.

2. The solitary ground of challenge in the present writ petition is that the petitioner has got only less than 15 months of service left for retirement. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner also is a lady and sending a lady, who has 15 months of service left for retirement, at this juncture, to Kondagaon would be

-2causing great inconvenience to the petitioner, as also to the family dependent upon the petitioner.

3. Given the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondent No.1 in this regard highlighting the inconvenience that the petitioner would face and the respondent No.1, in turn, shall considering the fact firstly that the petitioner is a lady and secondly the fact that the petitioner has got just about 15 months of service left for retirement, pass a suitable order.

4. Till the order is passed by the respondent No.1, the effect and operation of the impugned order, so far as the petitioner is concerned, shall remain stayed.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved