Vikas Kumar Yadav And Others v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Others

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2655 of 2011

1. Vikas Kumar Yadav S/o. Shiv Kumar Yadav, aged about 31 years, R/o Besides Vidyut Sub-Station, Ashok Nagar, Chantidih, District Bilaspur (CG)

2. Amit Bose S/o Shiv S.K.Bose, Aged about 38 years, C/o Rajesh Sonkar, Near Meman Provision Stores, Ruprela Gali, Raman Mandir Ward, Fafadih, Raipur (CG)

3. Devshankar Jaiswal S/o Niniram Jaiswal, Aged about 34 years, C/o Alankar Sadan, In Front Of Harigujar Math, Hatari Road, Sakti, Distt. Janjgir Champa (CG)

4. Vishwamitra Kashyap S/o B.R.Kashyap, aged about 38 years, R/o 42/153, Seepat Road, Chantidih, Near Petrol Pump, Chantidih, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG)

2. Chhattisgarh Paramedical Council through its Director, Paramedical Council, Raipur (CG)

3. Chhattisgarh Sahachikitskiya Parishad, Chhattisgarh through Registrar, Chhattisgarh Sahachikitskiya Parishad, Raipur Directorate, Medical Education, Mantralaya Parishad, Old Nurses Hostel Premises, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Cg

4. Govt. E. Raghvendra Rao Post Graduate Science College, Bilaspur Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Through its Principal, Govt. Science P.G. College, Bilaspur (CG), Old Name Govt. Autonomous Science Post Graduate Model College, Seepat Road, Bilaspur (CG)

5. Secretary, Chhattisgarh Sahachititskiya Parishad, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG)

6. Guru Ghasidas Central University Bilaspur (CG), Through its Registrar, Guru Ghasidas Central University, Bilaspur (CG)

7. Commissioner Higher Education Chhattisgarh Govt. Science College Premises, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr.Manoj Paranjape, Advocate For Res.No.1 and 7 :

Mr.Aditya Sharma, P.L.

For Res.No.2, 3 and 5 :

Mr.Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate For Res.No.6 :

Mr.Soumya Rai, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 10/05/2017

1.

The petitioners application for registration of Paramedical Practitioner has been rejected by order dated 24.11.2015. 2.

Order dated 24.11.2015 itself indicates that such an order is appealable under Section 43 of the Chhattisgarh Paramedical Council Act, 2001 before the Appellate Authority.

3.

Since the order is appealable and order dated 24.11.2015 has even not been challenged by the petitioners by filing separate writ petition, it would be appropriate that the petitioners may file appeal before the Appellate Authority within 30 days from today. 4.

Consequently, the application for amendment is rejected and the writ petition is disposed off with a direction that if the petitioners prefer an appeal within 30 days from today before the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority would do well and decide the appeal of the petitioners within a further period of two months from the date of filing of the appeal on behalf of the petitioners. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-