High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2843/2015disposed off

Dushyant Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-08-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2843 of 2015 • Dushyant Yadav S/o Late Shri Premlal Yadav Aged About 36 years Occupation Service, Assistant Grade- III In Education Department And Posted At Government R. K. Higher Secondary School, Pithoura, P. S. Pithoura, District Mahasamund, Civil And Revenue District Mahasamund, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Collector, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, (Chhattisgarh)

3. District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Principal, Government R. K. Higher Secondary School, Pithoura, P. S. Pithoura, District Mahasamund, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Lingraj Sahu Assistant Grade-III, Government Higher Secondary School, Saldih, Block Pithoura, P. S. Pithoura, District Mahasamund, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Ms. Indira Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent-State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 06/08/2015

1. In this petition, the petitioner is challenging his transfer from Government RK Higher Secondary School, Pithoura to Government Higher Secondary School, Saldih.

2. In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the

representation.

3. The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu