High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2915/2015dismissed

Chandramani Nayar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-08-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2915 of 2015 • Chandramani Nayar (wrongly mentioned in transfer order Nayyar) W/o Sanjay Malik Aged About 47 years R/o Quarter No. 7/B, Street No. 30/A, Sector- 10, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The District Medical Officer, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Commissioner- Durg Division, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Durg, District- Durg Chhattisgarh.

5. The Block Medical Officer- Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Jitendra Gupta, Advocate For Respondent-State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, Government Advocate with Shri S. Majid Ali, PL for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 12/08/2015

1. In this petition, the petitioner, who is working as ANM in the Durg District, has challenged the transfer order dated 20.07.2015, whereby she has been transfered from Sub-health Centre, Ruvabandha, Bhilai District Durg to Subhealth Centre, Tarrighat, Block Patan, District Durg on administrative grounds.

2. In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-72015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for the

petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation.

3. The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu