Punitdas v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3820 of 2016 Punitdas S/o Late Shri Churaman Das, Aged About 62 Years R/o Mother Teresa Nagar, E/2, Ward No 22, Bhilai, Distirct Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2.

The Director, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Indirawati Bhawan, Mantrlaaya, Naya Raipur, Disrict Raipur Chhattisgarh 3.

Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, Through Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2 :

Mr. Dilmanrati Minj, Dy. Govt. Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.

Order on Board 17/08/2016 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner's claim that regular services rendered by the petitioner as regular employee of erstwhile Special Area Development Authority (for short "SADA") Bhilai, where he was initially appointed, are liable to be counted for the purposes of pensionable services. He submits that identical issue has been decided by this Court vide order dated 08.02.2016 in batch of petitions WP(S) No.4459 of 2014 and other cases.

2.

Learned counsel for the respondents do not dispute that the petitioner's claim of being identically placed as the petitioner, in whose favour, orders were passed in the case referred to above.

3.

In view of the above, this petition is also liable to be allowed and is allowed. Let the same benefit accrue to the petitioner as directed by this Court vide order dated 08.02.2016 in similar petition. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tiwari