← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhTAXC/38/2014dismissed

M/S Msp Steel And Power Limited v. The Commissioner, Central Excise And Customs And ANR.

2015-02-04Hon'Ble The Acting Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy3 pages

-1- .<?• n'^6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

(CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONY TAXCASENO.

'S8 O^F2014 ..^'

APPELLANT : ^M/s.

MSP Steel & Power Limited,A Company registered ^' under Companies Act, -'^ haying^it's placeof business at ^o^ ViU.: Manupali, PO : Jajngaon, P.8.: Jamgaon, Chhatishgarh - 496001 represented through ^^^ ..

"

Sri Asesh Pal, Manager (Excise) \y''"\^"'"''

^ed about43 years who is a .^"

citizen of India.

VERSUS

RESPONDNETfSl

(1) ^/The Commissioner, Central Excise & Customs, Raipur Commissionerate, Central Excise Building, Dhamtari Road, Tikrapara, Raipur-492 001, Chhattishgarh.

:S^ .

(2^' Customs, Excise 85 Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Block No.2, R.K.Puram, NewDelhi- 110066.

1^>^\ r ^ :j

-2AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 35G OF THE CENTRAL EXCISEACT. 1944

•^ •^'

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BiLASPUE DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI P. SAM KOSHY, J.

TaxCaseNo.38of2014 APPELLANT M/s. MSP Steel & Power Limited.

VERSUS

The Commissioner, Central Excise & Customs & Another.

RESPONDENTS Tax Case No. 44 of 2014 APPELLANT M/s. Scania Steels & Powers Ltd.

1 % a

VERSUS

ftft 11% S jTh€|^(|b|nFhissjoner, Central Excise & ^Vt'-Gi^ •--- cust^msl^Wil|thep;

ARPlBABUNDER SECTION 35G OF THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT 1944 RESPONaBdTlS €%.

<------ ^pijbearance:

Shri Kartik Kurmy, Shri S.B.Sharma aifid Slin Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocates for the Appellant.

Shri ManeeshSharma, Advocate for the Respondents.

ORDER

(04thofFebruary,2015) Per Navin Sinha. Aca. <C.J.

1.

Learned Couns^l fe>r theAppellant submjts that these appeals were filed challenging d^iljgl^agrant waiver of pre-deposit while filing the appeal. Subsequently,the substantive appeal itself has been dismissed because of failure to make pre-deposit as directed. The appeals have therefore become infructuous and he may be permitted to withdraw the same.

2.

The appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- Acting Chief Justice Sd/- p.SainKoshy Judge ^ Amit