Preetam Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2885 of 2015 • Preetam Thakur S/o Milan Ram Thakur Aged About 25 years Working As Regional Health Organizer At Sub Health Centre, Tedesara, Ghumka, Rajnandgaon, Civil & Revenue District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. Commissioner, Directorate Health Services, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
3. Commissioner , Durg Division, District Durg, (Chhattisgarh)
4. Collector, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh)
5. Chief Medical & Health Officer, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh)
6. Santuram Kanwar S/o Durdeshiram, Aged About 30 Years Presently Posted At Primary Health Centre, Pandadah, Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner Shri Abhishek Sharma, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Shashank Thakur, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board By 10/08/2015 1.
In this petition, the petitioner is challenging his transfer from Sub Health Centre, Tedesara, Block Ghumka, District Rajnandgaon to Primary Health Centre, Pandadah, Khairagarh.
2.
In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation. 3.
The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. 4.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.
Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala