High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/180/2018disposed off

Smt. Shinki Meshram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-03-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 180 of 2018 Smt. Shinki Meshram, W/o. Shri Brijbhushan Yadav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o. Sukhchain Bada, Magarpara, Bilaspur, P.S. Civil Line, Tahsil & District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

...........(Complainant) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through its Secretary, Department Of Home Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Superintendent Of Police, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Station House Officer, Ajak Police Station Sarkanda, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

5. Brijbhushan Yadav, S/o. Ghanshyam Yadav, R/o. Abhishek Vihar, Phase - II, House No. 30, Mangla Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh......(Accused),

6. Ashish Dengvekar, S/o. Late P.V. Dengevekar, R/o. Abhishek Vihar, Phase - II, House No. 30, Mangla Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

7. Laxmi Jaiswal, R/o. Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri K.P.S.Gandhi, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Shri S.K.Mishra, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 28.03.2018 Heard

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite a report being made on 29.08.2017 to the police wherein cognizable offence has been reported, nothing has transpired and police has not registered the FIR.

2. Perused the written report Annexure P-1 which bears the seal of the police authorities to have received the same, therefore, in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Ram Lal Narang v. State (Delhi Admn.) (AIR 1979 SC 1791) and Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh

and Others {(2014) 2 SCC 1} wherein it has been held that in such complaints/FIR disclosing commission of cognizable offence, the concerned police shall register the FIR, complete the investigation within a reasonable time, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned police to proceed in accordance with law and do the needful for completing the investigation at the earliest.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge ashok