Vijay Kumar Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

(JGCD

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT

BILASPUliLCHHATTISGARH) WRIT PETITION(S) No. § l g' \ /2014.

PETITIONER:

Vijay Kumar Pandey, son of Late Tanak Ram Pandey, aged about 46 years, working as Assistant Teacher, xw a?

g Primary School Navapara, (West), \ \ _ Block Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

Versus

Respondents 1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, RS. Rakhi, Tahsil Aarang, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2.

Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3.

District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

4.

Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

5.

Block Education Officer, Kharsiya, District Raigarh,Chhattisgarh.

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1.

PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER(S):

As mentioned in the Cause title.

2.

PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTIS):

/

m m;J¢1£.<.$;2.i.-.s:.i.ssi};_;- 211 2014 anéémawW) '

mmaaam 19.12.2014 Shi J Ro d ft e p v r C..K.

a, gunsel or etitioner.

Smt.

eema ubey' Panel ye for t ta.

R L wr he Ste '

Heard L. N , ppli i seing perrYiiQh i withdraw thi bn o. 02 ac ton ek s$i d s peiin wt liberty to tile a di'

o tut'etitio tto ih uy cn iedpn:

the soris ioned n'he applicain, i i llowd and he or rea ment it to t s :ae t t i thd h s ti petiioner s permitted to wiraw t petion.

'as Iris dmid thdr wit et '

I cong, th etitn issse as wiawn h libry Acrdily e pio '

praed for.

y Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge