High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3012/2015withdrawn

Lalaram Rajotri v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-08-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3012 of 2015 • Lalaram Rajotri S/o Shri Jugut Ram, Aged About 46 Years Working As Aayurved Formist Government Ayurvedic Hospital Dudhli Block Dondilohara Distt. Balod (Chhattisgarh), R/o Village Kusumkasa, Tah.- Dondi, P.S.- Dallirajhara, District- Balod (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Health Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Balod (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Collector, Balod (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Rakesh Thakur, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri YS Thakur, Dy. AG for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 19/08/2015

1. In this petition, the petitioner, who is working as Aayurved Formist in the Balod District, has challenged the transfer order dated 20.07.2015, whereby he has been transfered from Government Ayurvedic Hospital Dudhli Block Dondilohara Distt. Balod (Chhattisgarh) to Government Ayurvedic Hospital Armarrykala, Block Gurur District Balod on administrative grounds.

2. In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-72015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation.

3. The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu