← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhFA/36/2005dissmiss for defaultnonprosecution

Dayalal v. Luxmi Singh Banarjee

2015-07-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri1 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR FA No. 36 of 2005 • Dayalal, S/o Samaru Lal, aged about 49 years, R/o. Village-Panora Para, Budgahan, Block and Police Chouki Baloda, Tahsil Janjgir, District JanjgirChampa C.G. ---- Appellant

Versus

• Luxmi Singh Banarjee, aged about 22 years, Son of Shyamlal Banjare, R/o. Village-Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa, C.G. ---- Respondent For Appellant :

None.

For Respondent.

:

None.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

ORDER

03/07/2015 1.

No one appears for the appellant even on fourth call of the last consecutive day of the week. Respondent is also not represented by any of the counsel.

2.

Since no one appears to argue the case on behalf of the appellant despite repeated calls till last day of the week, this Court is left with no other way except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3.

Accordingly this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE Rao