Vinod Sahu @ Vicky & ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 2182 of 2020 • Vinod Sahu @ Vicky & Anr. S/o Bharat Sahu Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Pangaon, Thana City Kotwali, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh • Vijay Banjare S/o Vyasnarayan Banjare Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Bamhanmudi, Thana City Kotwali, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicants

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station City Kotwali, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For Applicants : Ms. Supriya Upasne, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Ghanshyam Patel, GA Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order On Board 28/05/2020 The applicants have filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as they are in custody in connection with Crime No.129/2020 registered at police station City Kotwali, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 354(D)/34 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) (a) of SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act and Section 67 of the IT Act. Case of the prosecution in brief is that report was lodged by the complainant alleging that the applicants have clicked the photographs with a wrong intention by transmitting in electronic form in different

groups.

Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that the applicants are in jail since 09.03.2020; the charge sheet has been filed and looking to the conduct of the prosecution it is clear that the trial will take time for its conclusion.

On the other hand counsel for the State as well as the objector opposes the bail application.

Having heard counsel for the parties, considered the totality of the fact, in particular the detention period of the applicants, I am inclined to release them on regular bail. Accordingly, their application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is allowed. It is directed that in the event of applicants' furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety each, for the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, they shall be released on bail.

It is made clear that if the applicants' have already been released on bail pursuant to the bail bonds already furnishing in view of the order passed by the High Power Committee constituted in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court of India dated 23.03.2020 in the matter of In Re: Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in Prisons (Suo Moto Writ Petition (C) No. 1/2020), they need nod furnish bail bonds afresh and the bail bonds already furnished shall be deemed to be the bail bonds furnished in compliance of the order of this Court, but if they have not furnished the bail bonds earlier, then

they will be required to furnish bail bonds within four weeks' from today.

Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge suguna