Tripurari Lal Verma v. Chhattisgarh State Of Power Distribution Comp. Ltd.
AFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2571 of 2018
1. Tripurari Lal Verma S/o Ashwani Kumar Verma Aged About 38 Years R/o Village- Rampur, (Dagniya), Post Champaran, P. S. Nayapara, Tahsil- Abhanpur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Jag Jivan Sahu S/o Ramji Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village And Post Chhataud P. S. And Tahsil Tilda, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. Chhattisgarh State Of Power Distribution Comp. Ltd. ThroughManaging Director Dangniya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Executive Director ( O And M), CSPDCL, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Sudhakar Kakde (Contactor), S. K. Electrical, Engg. And Comp. Nagpur Orts. 10/20/ Works/ Cf- 125/ 297 District- Nagpur, Maharastra.
---- Respondents For the Petitioners :
Shri KPS Gandhi, Advocate For the Resp. No. 1 & 2 :
Shri Raja Sharma, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /07/2018
1. Heard counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners by way of this petition seeks a direction to the respondents for paying salary at par with the regular employees in the department on the basis of "Equal Pay For Equal Work". The petitioners rely upon the judgment of Supreme Court in case State of Punjab & Jagjit Singh and Others, 2017(1) SCC 148.
3. However, a perusal of record shows that the petitioners till date have not made any representation to the employer for redressal of their grievances. Without representation being made to the employer
for redressal of grievance, this petition at this juncture would be premature and the same is declined from being entertained. However, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the respondents by making a detailed representation in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in case of State of Punjab Vs. Jagjit Singh (Supra). In case such a representation is made, it is expected then the employer shall look into the matter and pass appropriate orders in accordance with rules. The petitioners are at liberty to re-agitate, if situation so warrants.
4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order asto costs.
Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde