Raghuveer Prasad Vishwakarma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1891 of 2020 Raghuveer Prasad Vishwakarma S/o Late Shri N.P. Vishwakarma, Aged About 63 Years R/o Ganga Nagar, Sector-02, Bilaspur, P.S. Civil Line, Tahsil and District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, P.S. & P.O. Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Engineer- In- Chief, Water Resource Department, Shivnath Bhawan, Sector No. 19, Police Station and Post Office Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Executive Engineer, Office of Executive Engineer, Water Resource Division, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For the State/Respondents : Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board -05-2020

1. The petitioner who was working as Assistant Engineer in Water Resources Department has retired from service on 30.04.2019. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite his retirement, he has not received the amounts of GIS & Travelling Allowances due to him. It is submitted that the petitioner has submitted a representation to the Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Division Korba and the same may be directed to be decided.

2. A perusal of Annexure P-1 shows that the petitioner already stands retired on 30.04.2019. Further after perusal of representations (Annexure P-2 & P3) submitted before the Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Raigarh (C.G) and Executive Engineer, Mungeli and Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, if the retiral dues like GIS and other dues of

Travelling Allowances for the years 2009-2010, 2012 to 214 still remains unpaid, then the same may be disbursed the petitioner after taking into account without any further delay. Therefore, the petitioner is given liberty to make a fresh detailed representation to Respondents 2 & 3 along with a copy of this order within a period of 30 days ventilating all the grievances and if such a representation is filed, the same will be considered and decided by the concerned authorities within a further period of 90 days from the date of receipt of such representation.

3. With the above observation/direction, this writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE Rao