Makardhwaj Pradhan v. State And Others
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP S No.
of
1. Makardhwaj Pradhan, Son of Bhagatram Pradhan, working as Peon in the Department of School Education at High School, Kodatarai, Distt. Raigarh (M.P.)
2. Bhuwan Lal Toppo, son of Daulatram Toppo, resident of Banora, working as Peon in the Kosir High School, Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (M.P.)
3. Madanlal, son of Hiralal, resident of Sarangarh, working as Peon in the Kosir High School, Sarangarh, Distt. Raigarh (M.P.)
4. Johit Ram Patel, Son of Bulaoram Patel, resident of Robertson Chaple, working as Peon, Govt. High School, Kirodimal Nagar.
5. Jagannath, son of Balakram Dansare, resident of Belpali, working as peon in the High School Mura, Distt. Raigarh (M.P.)
6. Lalit, Son of Khikhram Working as Peon in the High School, Kata Hardi, Kharsiya, District Raigarh (M.P.)
7. Alakhram, son of Rangu Ram, resident of Bulaki, Block Pussore, working as Peon in the Girls High School, Baramkela
8. Kamal Prasad Patel, son of Tej Ram Patel, working as Peon in the High School, Kata Hardi, Kharsiya, Raigarh (M.P.)
9. Ram Kumar Chanka, son of Bal Singh Chanka, working as peon in the Gudam High School, Sarangarh (M.P.) 10.Jeevan Lal Yadav, son of Jaymohan, resident of village Basnajhar, Kharsiya, working as peon in the Govt. School, Basnajhar, Block Kharsiya, Distt. Raigarh (M.P.) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Madhya Pradesh, through the Secretary, Department of School Education, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.)
2. The Director, Public Instructions, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal (M.P.)
3. The Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (M.P.)
4. Dy. Director, Public Instructions, Raigarh (M.P.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : None For State : Shri Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board 0 4 /01/2018 (1) Even after the matter was called in the second round, none appeared for the petitioners, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.
(2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-