Narendra Kumar Swami v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2946 of 2015 • Narendra Kumar Swami S/o Late Shri Keshavram Swami, Aged About 52 years Occupation- Subedar (M)/ Head Clerk, Working Under The Office Of Superintendent Of Police- (Radio) Bhilai Zone Bhilai, P. S. Bhilai, District- Durg (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Affairs, Police Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarters, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
3. Joint Director, Treasury, Account And Pension, Raipur, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
4. Superintendent Of Police, (Radio) Bhilai Zone Bhilai, District- Durg (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent And WPS No. 2955 Of 2015 • Smt. Harish Sahu W/o Late Shri Ramsay Sahu Aged About 28 years Occupation Head Constable ( M) Working Under The Office Of G. R. P. Police, P. S. Ganj, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner Vs
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Affairs, Police Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. The Secretary, Finance, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarters, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents (Note: The Cause Title has been reproduced as is available in the CIS Software)
For Petitioners Shri Prakash Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri S. Majid Ali, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board By 13/08/2015
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties would submit that the matter has already been considered by this Court in WP(S) No.4523/2014 (Francis Xavier Beck and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others and other connected matters) and WP (S) No.1975/2015 (A.P. Tripathi and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others and other connected matters) and final orders have been passed in the said matters on 03.07.2015 and 16.07.2015 respectively, therefore, the present writ petitions may be disposed of in terms of Francis Xavier Beck (supra) and A.P. Tripathi (supra).
2. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of Francis Xavier Beck (supra) and A.P. Tripathi (supra). Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala