High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3049/2015withdrawn

Ishwar Prasad Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-08-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3049 of 2015 • Ishwar Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Sunderlal Sahu, Aged About 25 Years Working As Male Rural Health Organizer, Sub Health Centre, Bilaigarh, Resident Of Villate-Churela, Post-Bhatgaon, Tahsil-Bilaigarh, DistrictBalodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya New Raipur, P.S.-Rakhi, District-Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Collector, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Chief Medical & Health Officer, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Block Medical Officer, Bilaigarh, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)

5. Yudhishthir Sahu, Working As Male Rural Health Organizer, Sub-Health Centre, Telasi, Palari, District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri DP Mishra, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 21/08/2015

1. In this petition, the petitioner, who is working as Male Rural Health Organizer in the Balodabazar-Bhatapara District, has challenged the transfer order dated 20.07.2015, whereby he has been transfered from Subhealth Centre, Bhandora, Block Bilaigarh to Sub-health Centre, Damru, Block Balodabazar, on administrative grounds.

2. In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-72015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation.

3. The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu