H.N.Verma v. State Of Madhya Pradesh And ORS.

INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH a . .,13 ,C.No.B4.

ABPLICANT .//H.N.

Verma son of late Shri .^ ^ Mahaveer Mehto, aged about 52 ^ , years, Occupation Service, Upper ^Division Clerk (Now retired .^•-s compulsorily) office of S.D.0.

.^'

^v ^y'

^^ 'f Agriculture Lirmi, District Bilasapur (M.P.),

VERSUS

NQXl^ State of Madhya Pradesh, Through : Secretary Department (RESPONDENTS1 of Agricultiu-e, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, M.P.

fl.

Joint Director, Agriculture, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur M.P., 3.

^--Sub Divisional Officer ^-.•.x/AMi;:;^--,,, ^.

(Agriculture) Lormi, District p^.^,^1 Bilaspur MP.

APPLICATIOH-FOR RESTORATIQN THE M.C.C.No?7S4/2012.DISM!ISSaEaS! E PROSECUTION iTliin-itiNmn-*^"- *-""-®*"

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI INDER SINGH UBOWEJA, J.

M.C.C.No. 844 of 2014 H.N.Verma.

APPLICANT PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Madhya Pradesh & Others.

NON-APPLICANT RESPONDENT APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF M.C.C. No. 784 OF 2012 Appearance: Shri Uttam Pandey, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri GarylVlykhopadhyay, Deputy GovernmentAdvocate ,, iy-fQrth^Siatea'y i"t I; ?3 :S; A, ..

O R D E R ?

(16th ofjanuary, 2015) Per Navin Sinha. Aca. C.J.

1.

Heard cou nsel for the parties:

2.

IA No.1, for cohdQnatidn of 25 days delay in filing the restoration application is allowed. Delay iscondoned.

3.

In view of the'nati.ire-ofl.hetirder dated 18.08.2014, we are not inclined to restore M.G.C No. 784 of 2012.

4.

This does not preclude the applicant from pursuing such other remedies as he may be advised in accordance with law with regard to the reliefsought in Writ Petition (S) No. 1070 of 2005 afresh. 5.

The application is dismissed with that observation. i Sd/-^- _._ Inder SingFi Ubowe)a Judge Sd/- Acting ChiefJustice Amit