High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1951/2020disposed off

Harihar Prasad Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-05-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1951 of 2020 • Harihar Prasad Singh S/o Late Ramnarayan Singh Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Gopalpur Police Station And Tahsil Surajpur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. District Education Officer Surajpur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

3. Block Education Officer Surajpur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh

4. The Joint Director Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Surajpur , District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vikas A. Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Mrs. Richa Shukla, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 26/05/2020

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is for grant of the benefit of one annual increment while fixing pension and other retiral dues payable to the petitioner.

2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner retired from service on 30th of June, 2018. Since he has retired from service w.e.f. 30.06.2018, he would be entitled for the annual increment that would be payable to him for the period between 1st of June, 2017 to 30th of June, 2018 as the date of annual increment payable to the petitioner is 1st of July. Therefore, according to the counsel for the petitioner, while quantifying pension and other retiral

dues, the annual increment which the petitioner became entitled for having worked till 30th June, 2018 has to be added to the last pay and other allowances also.

3. Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, let the concerned respondents consider the case of the petitioner for grant of one annual increment to the last salary which the petitioner has received for the purpose of quantifying pension and other retiral dues. While deciding the claim of the petitioner, the respondents shall take into consideration the judgment of the Division Bench of Madras High Court in the case of P. Ayyamperumal vs. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal and others decided on 15.09.2017 in W. P. No. 15732 of 2017.

4. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Vishakha