← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4400/2016disposed off

Bheem Sen Swarnkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-07-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.4400 of 2016 • Bheem Sen Swarnkar S/o Shri Bodh Ram Swarnkarm Aged About 52 Years Occupation Service, Presently Working As Head Master, Government Boys Middle School, Patthalgaon, Discharged Block Resources Coordinator, ( B R C) In The Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Civil And Revenue District Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Pension Bada, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Collector Cum District Missioin Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh)

4. The District Education Officer, District Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Block Education Officer, Block Patthalgaon, Distt. Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh)

6. Principal, Government Higher Secondary School Gala, Block Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh)

7. Laxman Sharma, Head Master & Lecturer, Government Primary School, Peetha Aama, Block Patthalgaon, Presently Working As Block Resources Coordinator Under Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Block Patthalgaon, District Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri R. S. Patel, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 :

Shri A. S. Kachhwaha with Shri B. L. Sahu, Advocates Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 20/07/2017 Heard.

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in these changed circumstances, this petition may be disposed off as the petitioner intends to prefer representation to the Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission in the light of circular dated

15-03-2017 (Annexure P/19) issued by the Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission. 3.

Therefore, without commenting upon the merits of the case, at this stage, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is finally disposed off, giving him liberty to prefer representation and that the Mission shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner would be at liberty to raise all the grounds, which have been raised in this petition as also raise any other grounds, which he thinks fit to seek relief.

SD/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tumane