High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2985/2015dismissed

Atul Kumar Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-08-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2985 of 2015 • Atul Kumar Pandey S/o Shri Ghanshyam Prasad Pandey Aged About 34 Years Presently Posted As M. P. W. (Male) At Sub- Health Centre, Naila, Block Nawagarh, R/o Village Dharashiv, Tahsil & Police Station- Janjgir, District- Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Raipur District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Collector, Janjgir- Champa, District Janjgir- Champa (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Chief Medical & Health Officer, Janjgir- Champa, District JanjgirChampa (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Block Medical Officer, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir - Champa (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 17/08/2015

1. In this petition, the petitioner, who is working as MPW (Male) in the JanjgirChampa District, has challenged the transfer order dated 20.07.2015, whereby he has been transfered from Sub-health Centre, Naila, Block Nawagarh to Sub-health Centre, Kachanda, Block Nawagarh, on administrative grounds.

2. In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for

the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation.

3. The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu