Smt. Shobha Bala v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2999 of 2015 • Smt. Shobha Bala W/o Shri Bimal Krishna Bala Aged About 46 Years Presently Posted As A. N. M. (Women Health Worker) At Sub- Health Center Pakhanjor (City) R/o Pakhanjor City Tahsil Pakhanjor, P. S. Pakhanjor, District North Bastar Kanker, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. The Collector, District North Bastar, Kanker (Chhattisgarh)
3. Chief Medical Officer, Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker, (Chhattisgarh)
4. Block Medical Health Officer, Community Health Center Pakhanjor, District North Bastar Kanker, (Chhattisgarh)
5. Smt. Juthika Visvas Auxiliary Midterm Nurse At Sub-Health Center Gondahoor, Block- Koylibeda Janpad Panchayat Koylibeda, District Kanker, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri JN Nande, Advocate For Respondents-State :
Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 18/08/2015
1. In this petition, the petitioner, who is working as ANM in the North Bastar District, has challenged the transfer order dated 20.07.2015, whereby she has been transfered from Sub-health Centre, Pakhanjor City, BlockPakhanjor District North Bastar to Sub-health Centre, Gondahoor, Block Koylibeda, on administrative grounds.
2. In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-72015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation.
3. The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu