Jitendra Gayakwad v. State Of Chhattisgarh

...

.

. 1N THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) CRIMINAL REVISION No.

5 yr OF 2013 (5.3.) _ ' Jitendra Gayakwad, APPLICANT d S/o .Purushottam Gayakwad, age, about 4O yeérs, R/o> Village 'Magarlod, Kish'ora, Police Station CiVil and Revenue District Dhamta'ri (C.G.) At

Present

R/o Professer Colony, Raipur, P'.S.

Purani Basti,.

Civil and Revenue District Raipur I (C.G.)

VERSUS

The State of Chhattisga'rh, RESPONDENT Through: the Police Station DD.

Nagar, Raipur, Civil andv Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) MEMO OF REVISION UNDER SECTION 397/R/W 4V01VOF TH CODE'OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE '

Lia/9w?

Being aggriev awm Nu a order dated / 07.08.2013 X (Annexure by the ed/ A-1)*6y the Court cf Ivth'AsfJI Raipur (C.G.) in s.T. No. 91/2013 of re:examination of proseation Witness no.

8.

Henceorder of re-examination of P.W.8 and finding recorded to the effect is questionable and is being questioned before this Hon'ble Court.

(%\G HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR @ (Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J) '

Criminal Revision No.585l13 (Revision under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C.) Applicant Jitendra Gayakwad Vs Respondent The State of Chhattisgarh

Present:

Mr. Malay Kumar Bhaduri, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. L. Sharma, Panel Lawyer for the non-applicant

ORDER

f\ (20.12.2013) 1.

By this revision the applicant has prayed for quashment of the order dated 07.08.2013 passed by the 4'"

Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur in S.T.

No.91l2013.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw this revision as the same has become infructuous.

3.

Consequently, the rewsuon is dismissed as Withdrawn. sd/_ T.P. Sharm"

Judge