Omprakash Rathore v. State Of Chhattisgarh
1 WA No. 249 of 2019 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 249 of 2019 • Omprakash Rathore S/o Late Ishwari Prasad Rathore Aged About 46 Years R/o Village And Post Nandaurkhurd, Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.
---- Appellant
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Collector Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.
3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sakti, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.
4. Janpad Panchayat Sakti Through Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Sakti, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh.
5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Sakti, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent For Appellant :- Shri Anshul Tiwari, Advocate.
For Respondent-State :- Shri Faiz Kazi, PL
2 WA No. 249 of 2019 Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, J.
Order on Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ 01/05/2019
1. Appellant's challenge to the order dated 19.02.2019 whereby he has been relieved for joining at the office of SDO (Revenue), Sakti, pursuant to Collector Janjgir Champa order dated 19.07.2016 has been dismissed for the reason that the cancellation of the order of attachment and the posting of the petitioner to the Parent Department within the same town and as such no inconvenience whatsoever would be caused to the petitioner except for change of Department or the change of office.
2. It appears, the petitioner is working as AG-III in the office of SDO (Revenue), Sakti, and was posted in the office of Janpad Panchayat, Sakti on 31.07.2012. In 2016 he was sent back to his parent office of SDO (Revenue), Sakti but the petitioner continued to work in the office of Janpad Panchayat, Sakti, therefore, the Janpad Panchayat, Sakti has now executed the Collector's order dated 19.07.2016 to relieve the petitioner from his office to enable him to join at the office of SDO (Revenue), Sakti.
3. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant and perusal
3 WA No. 249 of 2019 of the record we are satisfied that the view taken by the learned Single Judge does not call for any interference, the writ appeal has no substance and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Acting Chief Justice Judge Ankit