Gokul Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRCA No.344 of 2018 • Gokul Dewangan S/o Shri Dhansay Dewangan Aged About 26 Years R/oRajendra Nagar Ward - Balani Chowk Ward No. 7 Mungeli Poilcie Station City Kotwali Mungeli District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station City Kotwali, Mungeli, DistrictMungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent For Petitioner :
Shri Dhirendra Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State :
Shri S. Majid Ali, Dy.GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 17/05/2018 Heard.
2.
The applicant has preferred this application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.131/2018, registered at Police Station-City Kotwali, Mungeli, District Mungeli for alleged commission of offence under Sections 306 of IPC.
3.
Case of the prosecution is that the applicant harassed and tortured the victim to get married with him, quarreled with her and assaulted also and due to continuous torture/harassment, the victim committed suicide. 4.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated. It is next submitted that it is a case of affair between the parties, therefore, it cannot be said that the applicant has abetted commission of crime.
5.
On the other hand, learned State counsel opposed the prayer for grant of bail.
6.
Taking into consideration the submission of learned counsel for the parties, particularly taking into consideration the investigation done so far and the statements, which have been recorded, show that the victim committed suicide because of the continuous torture/harassment/quarrel and insistence on the prosecutrix regarding marriage by the applicant, therefore, in my considered opinion, no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. 7.
Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tumane