Ranjit Kumar Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1942 of 2020 • Ranjit Kumar Soni S/o Neelam Prasad Soni Aged About 34 Years Working As Assistant Grade - III, Office Of Assistant Public Prosecution, Balrampur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director Public Prosecution, State Of Chhattisgarh Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Deputy Director Public Prosecution, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh

4. Deputy Director Public Prosecution, Baikunthpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.

5. Deputy Director Public Prosecution, Balrampur, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 22/05/20

1. Grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Grade-III with a condition that first two years would be the probation period. It is stated that subsequently after completion of probation, 7 years have passed and though there is no complaint has been reported against the petitioner, the petitioner has not been regularized till date.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that considering the conduct of the petitioner, the recommendation Annexure P-2 was made by the Deputy Director Prosecution on 28.08.2015 to the Director Prosecution

to regularize the service of the petitioner and grant him regular pay scale, as prayed for in the application by the petitioner. The petitioner therefore submit that the representation of the petitioner, which has already been recommended by the Deputy Director Prosecution to the Director Prosecution by letter dated 28.08.2015 may be considered and the petitioner may be regularized.

3. Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner and after perusal of Annexure P-2, it appears that the petitioner has already filed an application for regularization, as he has successfully completed his period of probation. Having been completed such period of probation, if the representation of the petitioner is pending, the Director Prosecution is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti