High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/286/2017disposed off

Mohamad Arif Rokadiya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 286 of 2017 • Mohamad Arif Rokadiya S/o Mohamad Daud Rokadiya, Aged About 45 Years R/o Akash Ganga Colony, House No. 48, Rudri Road, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Home Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh Police Head Quarter Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Inspector General of Police, Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

4. Superintendent of Police, Balod, Chhattisgarh

5. Station House Officer, Police Station Gurur, District Balod Chhattisgarh

6. Mohamad Salim Rokadia S/o Mohamad Daud Bhai Rokadia Aged About 48 Years R/o Salewar Para, Near Haddi Gowon, Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

7. Mohamad Rijvan S/o Mohamad Sarif Rokadia R/o Mahant Ghasidas Ward Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

8. Mohamad Jikkar Rokadia S/o Mohamad Yakub Rokadia R/o Mahant Ghasidas Ward Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

9. Tahsildar, Gurur, District Balod Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Ms. Renu Kochar, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri Adhiraj Surana, Dy. GA for the State.

For Respondent No.6 :

Shri Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 10/04/2018

1. The instant petition has been filed claiming following reliefs:- "10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing police

authorities to register petitioner's complaint and lodged F.I.R. against respondent No.6 to 9.

10.2 That this Hon'ble court may be further pleased to pass any other consequential and other orders/writs which this Hon'ble court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. The reply of the State shows that the FIR has already been registered, therefore, no further direction can be given by this Court at this stage and the investigation is going on. It is expected that the State authorities shall complete the investigation within a reasonable time and proceed in accordance with law. In view of the same, at this stage, no further direction can be given in this petition.

3. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu