High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/898/2018disposed off

Lokesh Namdeo v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-04-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.898 of 2018

1. Lokesh Namdeo S/o Late Shri Shankar Lal Namdeo Aged About 30 Years R/o Ward No. 10, Kobiya, Bemetara, Chhattisgarh

2. Manish Dixit S/o Lavsingh Dixit, Aged About 42 Years R/o Ward 5 Kutchery Para, Bemetara, Chhattisgarh

3. Nagendra Kumar Srivas, S/o Late Shri Awadh Ram Srivas, Aged About 31 Years R/o Ward 8, Kutchery Para, Bemetara Chhattisgarh

4. Gajju @ Ashish Verma, S/o Umashanakar Verma, Aged About 36 Years R/o Ward 7, Kandar Para, Raipur Road, Bemetara Chhattisgarh -----Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Collector, Bemetara Chhattisgarh

4. Zila Panchayat, Bemetara, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bemetara Chhattisgarh

5. Municipal Council, Bemetara, Through The Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Bemetara Chhattisgarh

6. Sub Divisional Officer, Bemetara Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr.Vivek Shrivastava, Advocate For Res.No.1 to 3 and 6 :

Mr.S.P.Kale, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 04/04/2018

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners' representation is pending for consideration before respondent No.5.

2. Be that as it may, the petitioners are directed to make additional representation to respondent No.5. If such representation is made, respondent No.5 shall consider and decide the same as early as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of its receipt along with a copy of this order.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed off. No cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-