← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCR/145/2014dissmiss for defaultnonprosecution

Ramayan Das v. Kranti Kumar And ORS.

2015-01-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

c C, {5' // $§mgéa 85mg

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH

AT BILASPUR (C.G.l CIVIL REVISION No.

or 2014 APPLICANTS] :

Ramayan Das S/o Tulasi Das Non-Applicant :

Panika, aged about 3O years, n°'5 gL '1 R/o Village Post - Ranjana, Tahsil-Pali, DistrictKorba (C.G.)

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS 1.

Kranti Kumar S/o Dhandas he Panika, aged about years, R/o Village-Deepaka, TahsilKatgora, District-Korba (C.G.) I . , Appj) Lard}- 2.

Aam Janata / g'

Mukhya Mahaprabandhak, SECL Gevara Pariyojana, PostGevara, Tahsil-Katghora, District-Korba (C.G.) 9'

Kshetriya Aayukat CMPF l'gSeepat Road, SeCl Karyalaya Ke Paas, Tahsil 85 District-Bilaspur '

(C.G.) '

Sahayaak Shram Aayukat Main Road Torwa, Tahsil 8r, DistricrtKorba (C.G.) "Non-Applicant No. kkk (l "CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 384 (3) of INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 R/W UNDER SECTION 115 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908

, w mam-«Rx, W,W m<m.@¢.w:¢€m .wtfi 20 mmwafgw) mm WW V mm Wané$ amméam amWW I $3i€manés1 B' HON'BLE SHRI GOUTAM BHADURI, J S 29.71.2015 None for the applicant when the matter is taken up on second round.

The matter has been listed for orders on default. Since no one appears on behalf of the applicant even in second round, this Court has no other way except to dismiss the revision for want of prosecuti n.

i this ,re sion Accordingly, istrdismissed for want of prosecution.

.

5diGoutam Bhadur'x Judge Ra o