P. K. Sawra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3091 of 2015 • P. K. Sawra S/o Late Shri Panchanan Vishal, Aged About 48 Years ( Retd. Assi. Statistical OfÏcer ) R/o Amli Bhauna Bajrangpara, Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Finance Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Directorate, Finance And Statistical Department, Kaushilya Bhawan, Bairan Bazar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Deputy Director, District Planning And Statistical OfÏce, Sukuma, District Sukma Chhattisgarh

4. District Planning And Statistical OfÏcer, South Bastar, Dantewada Chhattisgarh

5. Shishirkant Pandey, In - Charge District Planning OfÏcer, Sukma, District Sukma Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioners Mr. U.R. Koshley, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 25/08/2015

1. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.

2. By this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the

respondents to release retrial dues and other pensionary benefits as also the consequential benefits along with interest.

3. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue involved and the relief claimed in the present petition are required to be considered by the pension committee.

4. This Court, in the matter of W.P. No. 4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal v. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retiral dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19/06/2006 passed in W.P. No. 1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government and Others) and order dated 13/03/2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh & Others V. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31st of January, 2008 passed in W.P. No. 4642/2004 Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties.

5. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e. the ofÏce of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition from the petitioner and this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and the ofÏcers concerned, within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties. The petitioner and the ofÏcers concerned may file additional

documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including retrial dues of the employee and other pensionary benefits, if any, to the petitioner be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. The petitioner shall supply extra copy of the petition to learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents for forwarding the same to the Committee.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that liberty may be reserved in favour of the petitioner to move fresh writ petition if the decision made by the Committee on anyone of the claim including claim for interest is decided against the petitioner.

8. Liberty as prayed for is granted.

9. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna