← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/876/2019dismissed

State Of Chhattisgarh v. Sundar Lal

2019-06-18Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No.876 of 2019 State Of Chhattisgarh Through-Its Station House Officer, Police Station Kukdur, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

Sundar Lal, S/o Harisingh Padwar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Polmi, Police Station Kukdur, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh --- Respondent For State/Petitioner :

Mr. Vikas Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer DB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order On Board 18/06/2019 Heard on application for condonation of delay in filing appeal. Upon due consideration, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned.

Also heard on application for grant of leave to appeal. 1.

Learned State counsel would argue that even though the prosecutrix has clearly stated that the appellant entered the house in the night and outraged her modesty with an intent to commit rape on her, learned Trial Court has granted acquittal only on the ground that the prosecutrix and the accused earlier had an affair and they had lived together for many days. 2.

We have gone through the impugned judgment and the evidence on record, particularly that of the prosecutrix as also her father-in-law, Lachhnu (PW2). The prosecutrix in her cross-examination has admitted regarding an affair between her and the accused so much so that in the past, they had left their respective house and eloped and resided together for many days before returning back. The evidence of father-in-law, Lachhnu (PW2) is that in the night, when he heard noises and came out then he saw the respondent accused was present in his house. It is only at this stage that the

prosecutrix raised an alarm. In this background and the evidence, learned Trial Court has granted respondent accused benefit of doubt, we do not find suffers from any patent illegality or perversity so as to call for interference, given the limited scope of interference against the judgment of acquittal. No case is made out for grant of leave to appeal. Therefore, the CRMP is dismissed.

Sd/- Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) (Rajani Dubey) Judge Judge Rekha