High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/5867/2005disposed off

Raghoba v. Homan Lal And ORS.

2017-11-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition No.5866 of 2005 Raghoba, son of Shri Raghupat Rao Mahadik, aged about 40 years, resident of Rajim, Tehsil Rajim, District Raipur ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Ram Kumar son of Shri Rambishaal Sahu, aged about 33 years, resident of village Semhartara, Tehsil Rajim, District Raipur

2. The Returning Officer, Block Fingeshwar, through the Tehsildar, Rajim, Disrict Raipur

3. The Collector, Raipur

4. The Upper Collector (Specified Officer), Gariyabandh, District Raipur

5. The Tehsildar, Rajim, District Raipur --- Respondents And Writ Petition No.5867 of 2005 Raghoba, son of Shri Raghupat Rao Mahadik, aged about 40 years, resident of Rajim, Tehsil Rajim, District Raipur ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Homan Lal, son of Shri Bisahu Ram Sahu, aged about 39 years, resident of Kondkera, Rajim, District Raipur

2. Manharan Lal, son of Shri Alaluram Sahu, aged about 25 years, resident of Village Kondkera, Rajim District Raipur

3. Mohan, son of Shri Ramratan Sahu, aged about 35 years, residnet of Village Kondkera, Rajim, District Raipur

4. Raj Kumar son of Shri Manik Ram, aged about 35 years, resident of Village Devri, Tehsil Rajim, District Raipur

5. Dwarika, son of Shri Biselal Sahu, aged about 25 years, resident of Village Kondkera, Rajim District Raipur

6. Atma Ram, son of Shri Lachchan Ram, aged about 35 years,

resident of Village Devri, Rajim, District Raipur

7. Parsuram, son of Shri Salikram, aged about 40 years, resident of Village Kondkera, Rajim, District Raipur

8. The Returning Officer, Block Fingeshwar, through the Tehsildar, Rajim, District Raipur

9. The Collector, Raipur 10.

The Upper Collector (Specified Officer), Gariyabandh, District Raipur 11.The Tehsildar, Rajim, District Raipur --- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr.B.P.Sharma, Advocate For State :

Mr. Arun Sao, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 21/11/2017 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that these writ petitions be disposed of as the period for which the petitioner was elected has already came to an end. However, liberty be reserved in favour of the petitioner to raise grounds in WPC No.3663/2008, which have been raised in these writ petitions. (2) Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of with the aforesaid liberty in favour of the petitioner. No cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge B/-